Publications

Abstract Objective Detection of antinuclear antibodies and specific autoantibodies is important in the diagnosis and classification of SSc. Several proteins of the Th/To complex, including Rpp25, Rpp38 and hPop1 are the target of autoantibodies in SSc patients. However, very little is known about the epitope distribution of this autoantigen. Consequently, we screened Rpp25, Rpp38 and hPop1 for B cell epitopes and evaluated their clinical relevance. Methods Serum pools with (n = 2) and without (n = 1) anti-Th/To autoantibodies were generated and used for epitope discovery. Identified biomarker candidate sequences were then utilized to synthesize synthetic, biotinylated, soluble peptides. The peptides were tested to determine reactivity with sera from SSc cohorts (n = 202) and controls (n = 159) using a chemiluminescence immunoassay. Additionally, samples were also tested for antibodies to full-length recombinant Rpp25 antibodies by chemiluminescence immunoassay. Results Several immunodominant regions were found on the three proteins. The strongest reactivity was observed with an Rpp38 peptide (aa 229–243). Autoantibodies to the Rpp38 peptide were detected in 8/149 (5.4%) limited cutaneous SSc patients, but not in any of 159 controls (P = 0.003 by two-sided Fisher’s exact probability test). Although reactivity to the novel antigenic peptide was correlated with the binding to Rpp25 (rho = 0.44; P < 0.0001), subsets of patient sera either reacted strongly with Rpp25 or with the novel Rpp38-derived peptide. Conclusion A novel Rpp38 epitope holds promise to increase the sensitivity in the detection of anti-Th/To autoantibodies, thus enhancing the serological diagnosis of SSc.

Objective: To assess in an observational study whether serum peptide antibody reactivities may distinguish aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody (Ab)–positive and -negative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: We screened 8,700 peptides that included human and viral antigens of potential relevance for inflammatory demyelinating diseases and random peptides with pooled sera from different patient groups and healthy controls to set up a customized microarray with 700 peptides. With this microarray, we tested sera from 66 patients with AQP4-Ab-positive (n = 16) and AQP4-Ab-negative (n = 19) NMOSD, RRMS (n = 11), and healthy controls (n = 20). Results: Differential peptide reactivities distinguished NMOSD subgroups from RRMS in 80% of patients. However, the 2 NMOSD subgroups were not well-discriminated, although those patients are clearly separated by their antibody reactivities against AQP4 in cell-based assays. Elevated reactivities to myelin and Epstein-Barr virus peptides were present in RRMS and to AQP4 and AQP1 peptides in AQP4-Ab-positive NMOSD. Conclusions: While AQP4-Ab-positive and -negative NMOSD subgroups are not well-discriminated by peptide antibody reactivities, our findings suggest that peptide antibody reactivities may have the potential to distinguish between both NMOSD subgroups and MS. Future studies should thus concentrate on evaluating peptide antibody reactivities for the differentiation of AQP4-Ab-negative NMOSD and MS.