Publications

Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) associated with autoantibodies against leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein-1 (LGI1) can present with faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS) and/or limbic encephalitis (LE). The reasons for this heterogeneity in phenotypes are unclear. We performed autoantibody (abs) characterization per patient, two patients suffering from LE and two from FBDS, using isolated antibodies specified with single amino acid epitope mapping. Electrophysiological slice recordings were conducted alongside spine density measurements, postsynaptic Alpha-amino-3-hydoxy-5-methyl-4-isoaxole-proprionate-receptors (AMPA-R) and N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptors receptor (NMDA-R) cluster counting. These results were correlated with the symptoms of each patient. While LGI1 abs from LE patients mainly interacted with the Leucine-rich repeat section of LGI1, abs from both FBDS patients also recognized the Epitempin section as well. Six-hour incubation of mouse hippocampal slices with LE patients autoantibodies but not from the FBDS patients resulted in a significant decline in long-term potentiation (p = 0.0015) or short-term plasticity at CA3-CA1 neurons and in decreased hippocampal synaptic density. Cluster differentiation showed no decrease in postsynaptic AMPA-R and NMDA-R. LGI1 autoantibodies selected by phenotype show an almost distinct epitope pattern, elicit disparate functional effects on hippocampal neurons, and cause divergent effects on spine density. This data illuminates potential pathomechanisms for disease heterogeneity in LGI1 AE.

(1) Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) are important diagnostic biomarkers. Among the rarest and most challenging MSA are anti-OJ antibodies which are associated with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS). In contrast to the other tRNA synthetases that are targets of ASS autoantibodies (e.g Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, KS, Zo), OJ represents a macromolecular complex with several ribonucleoprotein subunits. Therefore, the choice of the antigen in autoantibody assays can be challenging. (2) Methods: We collected two independent cohorts with anti-OJ antibodies, one based on a commercial line immunoassay (LIA) (n = 39), the second based on protein immunoprecipitation (IP) (n = 15). Samples were tested using a particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) system that allows for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to various autoantigens. For the detection of anti-OJ antibodies, two different antigens were deployed (KARS, IARS) on PMAT. The reactivity to the two antigens KARS and IARS was analyzed individually and combined in a score (sum of the median fluorescence intensities). (3) Results: In the cohort selection based on LIA, 3/39 (7.7%) samples were positive for anti-KARS and 7/39 (17.9%) for anti-IARS and 14/39 (35.9%) when the two antigens were combined. In contrast, in samples selected by IP the sensitivity of anti-KARS was higher: 6/15 (40.0%) samples were positive for anti-KARS, 4/15 (26.7%) for anti-IARS and 12/15 (80.0%) for the combination of the two antigens. 18/39 (46.2%) of the LIA samples generated a cytoplasmic IIF pattern (compatible with anti-synthetase antibodies), but there was no association with the antibody levels, neither with LIA nor with PMAT. (4) Conclusions: The combination of IARS and KARS might represent a promising approach for the detection of anti-OJ antibodies on a fully automated platform.